Inguinal Hernia Repair: Principles and Practice in the United Kingdom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.2872Abstract
References
1. Ham C. A review of literature. In:Ham C, Ed. Health Care Variations: Assessment in
Evidence: Resarch report No. 2. London, England: King's Fund Institute. 1988.
2. Ridgway PF, Shah J, Darzi AW. Male genital tract injuries after contemporary inguinal
hernia repair. BJU Int 2002;90(3):272-6.
3. Mizrahi H, Parker MC. Management of asymptomatic inguinal hernia: a systematic review
of the evidence. Arch Surg 2012;147(3):277-81.
4. NHS England, Interim Clinical Commissioning Policy: Abdominal Wall Hernia
Management and repair in Adults. https://wwwenglandnhsuk/commissioning/wp
content/uploads/sites/12/2013/11/N-SC001pdf 2013 (accessed 16 December 2016).
5. Natonal Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Groin hernia guidelines.
http://wwwevidencenhsuk/Search?q=guidelines+hernia 2013 (accessed 16 December 2016)
6. Bracale U, Melillo P, Pignata G, et al. Which is the best laparoscopic approach for inguinal
hernia repair: TEP or TAPP? A systematic review of the literature with a network meta
analysis. Surg Endosc 2012;26(12):3355-66.
7. Far SS, Miraj S. Single-incision laparoscopy surgery: a systematic review. Electron
Physician 2016;8(10):3088-95.
8. Cestari A, Galli AC, Sangalli MN, et al. Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) bilateral hernioplasty using the Single Site(R) robotic da Vinci platform (DV-SS TEP): description of the technique and preliminary results. Hernia 2016 Nov 22. [Epub ahead of print] [PMID:27878458].
9. Bobo Z, Nan W, Qin Q, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing
Lichtenstein and totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty in treatment of inguinal
hernias. J Surg Res 2014;192(2):409-20.
10. Li J, Ji Z, Li Y. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open procedure in the treatment of
recurrent inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of the results. Am J Surg 2014;207(4):602-12.
Evidence: Resarch report No. 2. London, England: King's Fund Institute. 1988.
2. Ridgway PF, Shah J, Darzi AW. Male genital tract injuries after contemporary inguinal
hernia repair. BJU Int 2002;90(3):272-6.
3. Mizrahi H, Parker MC. Management of asymptomatic inguinal hernia: a systematic review
of the evidence. Arch Surg 2012;147(3):277-81.
4. NHS England, Interim Clinical Commissioning Policy: Abdominal Wall Hernia
Management and repair in Adults. https://wwwenglandnhsuk/commissioning/wp
content/uploads/sites/12/2013/11/N-SC001pdf 2013 (accessed 16 December 2016).
5. Natonal Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Groin hernia guidelines.
http://wwwevidencenhsuk/Search?q=guidelines+hernia 2013 (accessed 16 December 2016)
6. Bracale U, Melillo P, Pignata G, et al. Which is the best laparoscopic approach for inguinal
hernia repair: TEP or TAPP? A systematic review of the literature with a network meta
analysis. Surg Endosc 2012;26(12):3355-66.
7. Far SS, Miraj S. Single-incision laparoscopy surgery: a systematic review. Electron
Physician 2016;8(10):3088-95.
8. Cestari A, Galli AC, Sangalli MN, et al. Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) bilateral hernioplasty using the Single Site(R) robotic da Vinci platform (DV-SS TEP): description of the technique and preliminary results. Hernia 2016 Nov 22. [Epub ahead of print] [PMID:27878458].
9. Bobo Z, Nan W, Qin Q, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing
Lichtenstein and totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty in treatment of inguinal
hernias. J Surg Res 2014;192(2):409-20.
10. Li J, Ji Z, Li Y. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open procedure in the treatment of
recurrent inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of the results. Am J Surg 2014;207(4):602-12.
Downloads
Published
2016-12-23
How to Cite
Shrestha, B. M. (2016). Inguinal Hernia Repair: Principles and Practice in the United Kingdom. Journal of Nepal Medical Association, 55(204), I-II. https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.2872
Issue
Section
Guest Editorial
License
JNMA allow to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The author(s) are allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions. The JNMA work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. More about Copyright Policy.
