Visualisation of Rouviere’s Sulcus during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Introduction: Safe dissection of Calot’s Triangle is important during the performance of laparascopic cholucystectomy. The purpose of the study is to determine the frequency of demonstrable Rouviere’s sulcus in patients with symptomatic gall stones and its role in safe dissection in Calot’s triangle.
Methods: This is a prospective descriptive study design done in Department of surgery, Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital from Jan 2013 to Jan 2015. Patients who were posted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included. During laparoscopy, Rouviere’s sulcus was noted in the operative note and classified according to following: Type I: Open type was defined as a cleft in which the right hepatic pedicle was visualized and the sulcus was opened throughout its length. Type II: if the sulcus was open only at its lateral end. Type III If the sulcus was open only at its medial end. Type IV: Fused type was defined as one in which the pedicle was not visualized.
Results: A total of 200 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during period of 2 years. Out of which Rouviere’s sulcus was visualized in 150 patients (75 %).Type I (open type) was commoner in 54%, type II in 12%, Type III in 9% and type IV (fused type) in 25%.
Conclusions: Rouviere’s Sulcus is an important extra biliary land mark for safe dissection of Calot’s triangle during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Keywords: Rouviere’s Sulcus, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bile duct injury.
surgical hazard? Br J Surg 1986; 73: 245–47.
2. Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J. The European experience
with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1991; 161:
3. The Southern Surgeons Club. A prospective analysis of
1,518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Eng J Med 1991;324:
4. Baily RW, Zucker KA, Flowers JL Laparoscopic
cholecystectomy experience with 375 consecutive patients.
Ann Surg 1991;214: 531–41.
5. Adams DB, Mark RB, Wootton III FT, Cunningham JT. "Bile
duct complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy."
Surg Endosc 1993;7(2):79-83.
6. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST,Airan
MC. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A
national survey of 4292 hospitals and an analysis of 77 604
cases. Am. J. Surg. 1993; 165: 9–14.
7. Strassberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem
of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am
Coll Surg 1995; 180: 101–25.
8. Hugh TB, Kelly MD, Mekisic A. Rouviere’s sulcus: A useful
landmark in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br. J. Surg. 1997;
9. Slater K, Strong RW, Wall DR, Lynch SV. "Iatrogenic bile
duct injury: the scourge of laparoscopic cholecystectomy."
ANZ J Surg. 2002 Feb; 72(2):83-8.
10. Nagral S. "Anatomy relevant to cholecystectomy." J Minim
Access Surg. 2005 Jun; 1(2):53-8.
11. Singh, K, Ohri A. "Anatomic landmarks: their usefulness in
safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy." Surg Endosc. 2006 Nov;
12. Rouviere H. Sur la configuration et la signification du sillon
du processus caude. Bulletins et memoires de la societe
Anatomique de Paris 1924;94: 355–358
13. Hugh TB. "New strategies to prevent laparoscopic bile duct
injury—surgeons can learn from pilots." Surgery 2002; 132(5):
14. Zha Y, Chen XR, Luo D, Jin Y. The prevention of major bile duct
injures in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the experience with
13,000 patients in a single center. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan
Tech. 2010 Dec; 20(6):378-83.
15. Kawarada Y, Das BC, Taoka H. "Anatomy of the hepatic hilar area:
the plate system." J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000; 7(6):580-6.
16. Mouly C, Fuks D, Browet F, Mauvais F, Potier A, Yzet T, Quentin
Q, Regimbeau JM . Feasibility of the Glissonian approach during
right hepatectomy. HPB(oxford) 2013; 15(8): 638-45.
17. Muhammad Z, Lubna H, Farzana M, Masoom RM, Mehmood AK,
Quraishy MS. "Rouviere’s sulcus: a guide to safe dissection and
laparoscopic cholecystectomy." Pak J Surg 2009; 22(2): 119-21.
18. Dahmane, R, Morjane A, Starc A. Anatomy and surgical relevance
of Rouviere’s sulcus. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Nov 6; 2013:
19. Connor S, Garden OJ. Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic
cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2006; 93(2):158-68.
20. Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W, et al. Causes and prevention of
laparoscopic bile duct injuries: Analysis of 252 cases from a human
factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg 2003;
21. Sanjay P, Fulke JL, Exon DJ. Critical view of safety as an alternative
to routine intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic
cholecystectomy for acute biliary pathology. J Gastrointest Surg
22. Ludwig K, Bernhardt J, Steffen H, Lorenz D. Contribution of
intraoperative cholangiography to incidence and outcome of
common bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Surg Endosc 2002; 16:1098-104.
23. Fletcher DR, Hobbs MS, Tan P, et al. Complications of
cholecystectomy: Risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective
effects of operative cholangiography: A population-based study.
Ann Surg 1999; 229:449-57.
24. Ishizawa T, Bandai Y, Ijichi M, Kaneko J, Hasegawa K, Kokudo
N. Fluorescent cholangiography illuminating the biliary tree during
laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 1369-77.
25. Reason J. Human error: Models and management. Br Med J 2000;
26. Hunter JG. Avoidance of bile duct injury during laparoscopic
cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1991; 162:71-76.
27. Connor SJ, Perry W, Nathanson L, Hugh TB, Hugh TJ . Using a
standardized method for laparoscopic cholecystectomy to create a
concept operation‐specific checklist. HPB 2014; 16(5): 422-429.
JNMA allow to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The author(s) are allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions. The JNMA work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. More about Copyright Policy.