STATUS OF PUBLICATIONS IN JOURNAL OF NEPAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION DURING 1991-2000: AN OVERVIEW - I

Abstract

This is a "meta-analytical" study of publications in Journal of Nepal Medical
Association (JNMA). The study aimed at investigating the quantitative status of
publications in JNMA during 1991-2000, which could possibly be used as a feedback
for improvement of journal quality. A total of 469 articles were classified according to
their headings. They were sub-grouped into yearly, two-yearly (1991-1992, 1993-1994
etc), three-yearly (e.g., 1991-1993, 1994-1996 etc), and five-yearly (1991-1995, 1996-2000) basis. The proportions of articles within each sub-group across time from 1991
to 2000 were compared (e.g., 1991-1992 vs. 1993-1994 etc) using Fisher exact or chi-square test. The JNMA publications during 1998-1999 were also compared with JIMA
(Journal of Indian Medical Association) publications. The results showed that the
original articles and case reports were significantly less during mid nineties of the
20th century. The editorials increased significantly whereas the articles on 'health
care' and 'clinical pharmacology' were decreased in the 2nd half of the decade. When
the publications during 1998-1999 were compared with JIMA, the proportions of review
and original articles in JNMA were significantly more. But the proportion of reviews
relative to original articles was significantly less in JNMA as compared to JIMA. The
JNMA was specially featured with articles on medical education, and health policy
and planning whereas the JIMA had more articles of interest for general practitioners.
In conclusion, the JNMA publications during the period of 1991-2000 were not
consistent. The JNMA may need reconsideration of publication policy and to take
measures to maintain constancy of its publications.
Key Words: meta-analysis, quality publication, quantity of publication.