EPISIOTOMY : A CHALLENGING OBSTETRIC INTERVENTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.791Abstract
ABSTRACT
The professional literatures on the development of widely practiced procedure, episiotomy through the
years from the first publication in 1742 are reviewed. It reveals the change in number of publication as well
as the contributors to the development of perception about episiotomy. So it consisted expression of opinion
of doctors initially then the co-workers like nurses and researchers and clients or consumers themselves
too. It concludes that episiotomies prevent anterior perineal tear but fails to accomplish other benefits
traditionally ascribed to pelvic floor damage and relaxation including its sequel and also protection of
newboin from intracranial haemorrhage and intrapartum asphyxia. Episiotomy substantially increase
maternal blood loss during delivery and risk of anal sphincter damage with their long term morbidity.
There is an urgent need to restrict the use of episiotomy in vaginal delivery.
Key Words: Episiotomy, Perineal tear, anal sphincter damage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
JNMA allow to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The author(s) are allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions. The JNMA work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. More about Copyright Policy.